US-CHINA CONFLICT TODAY
Abstract
This study examines the multidimensional and intensifying rivalry between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, focusing on three major fronts: the Taiwan issue, the South China Sea disputes, and the ongoing trade war. Each of these conflict areas reflects a broader struggle for regional and global dominance between an established hegemon and an emerging power. Taiwan, positioned at the heart of East Asia, serves not only as a geopolitical fault line but also as a symbolic battleground between democratic governance and authoritarian ambition. Similarly, the South China Sea has become a contested maritime domain where overlapping sovereignty claims, military buildups, and freedom of navigation operations intensify tensions. The trade war, beginning in 2018, underscores deeper structural disagreements over technology, market access, and economic influence. Through a comprehensive analysis of historical developments, foreign policy shifts, and strategic behavior, this paper aims to provide a clearer understanding of how the U.S.-China rivalry shapes global security dynamics and challenges the existing international order.
Keywords; Taiwan issue, South China Sea, Strategic rivalry, One China Policy, Trade War
Öz:
Bu çalışma, ABD ile Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti arasındaki çok boyutlu ve yoğunlaşan rekabeti, üç ana cepheye odaklanarak inceliyor: Tayvan sorunu, Güney Çin Denizi anlaşmazlıkları ve devam eden ticaret savaşı. Bu çatışma alanlarının her biri, yerleşik bir hegemon ile yükselen bir güç arasındaki bölgesel ve küresel hakimiyet için daha geniş bir mücadeleyi yansıtıyor. Doğu Asya'nın kalbinde yer alan Tayvan, yalnızca jeopolitik bir fay hattı olarak değil, aynı zamanda demokratik yönetim ile otoriter hırs arasında sembolik bir savaş alanı olarak da hizmet ediyor. Benzer şekilde, Güney Çin Denizi, örtüşen egemenlik iddialarının, askeri yığınakların ve seyrüsefer özgürlüğü operasyonlarının gerginlikleri yoğunlaştırdığı tartışmalı bir deniz alanı haline geldi. 2018'de başlayan ticaret savaşı, teknoloji, pazar erişimi ve ekonomik etki konusunda daha derin yapısal anlaşmazlıkların altını çiziyor. Tarihsel gelişmelerin, dış politika değişimlerinin ve stratejik davranışların kapsamlı bir analizi yoluyla, bu makale ABD-Çin rekabetinin küresel güvenlik dinamiklerini nasıl şekillendirdiği ve mevcut uluslararası düzeni nasıl tehdit ettiği konusunda daha net bir anlayış sağlamayı amaçlıyor
Anahtar Kelimeler; Tayvan sorunu, Güney Çin Denizi, Stratejik rekabet, Tek Çin Politikası, Ticaret Savaşı
Introductıon
The evolving rivalry between the United States and China represents one of the most significant challenges to the post-Cold War liberal international order. As China’s economic and military capabilities have grown in the past decades, so too has its ambition to assert greater influence both regionally and globally. This rise has triggered strategic anxieties in Washington, where policymakers view Beijing not only as a potential peer competitor but also as a revisionist power seeking to reshape the rules-based international system. Central to this power struggle are three interconnected issues: the Taiwan question, disputes in the South China Sea, and the broader trade and technology war. Taiwan remains the most sensitive and volatile issue in U.S.-China relations. While Beijing considers Taiwan an integral part of its territory under the “One China” policy, the island continues to function as a self-governing democracy with increasing calls for international recognition. The United States, despite officially recognizing the PRC, maintains strong unofficial ties with Taiwan and supports its defense, a policy that has repeatedly provoked harsh responses from China. The situation has created a dangerous triangle in which sovereignty, ideology, and strategic interests collide. In parallel, the South China Sea has emerged as another hotspot where the strategic interests of both powers intersect. China’s expansive maritime claims, based on the controversial “Nine-Dash Line,” have brought it into direct conflict with neighboring countries and the U.S., which conducts Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOPs) to challenge Beijing’s claims. The region’s importance for global trade and energy routes makes it a key arena in the U.S.‘s Indo-Pacific strategy and a critical test of China’s regional ambitions. Finally, the trade war initiated in 2018 has transformed economic competition into a systemic rivalry. The U.S. has accused China of unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft, and coercive technology transfer, while China views American tariffs and sanctions as attempts to contain its development. The economic decoupling and strategic mistrust that followed have spilled over into broader domains such as technology, finance, and global governance.
This paper explores these three conflict areas as interconnected facets of a larger geopolitical contest, analyzing how they reinforce each other and contribute to the increasingly adversarial nature of U.S.-China relations. In doing so, it sheds light on the shifting balance of power in the Asia-Pacific and the uncertain future of international cooperation in an era of great power competition.
Taiwan Issue in the Context of US-China Relations
Taiwan has an important geo-strategic location on the Taiwan Strait, which connects the Pacific Ocean to the South China Sea (SCS). With an area of 38,188 square kilometers, Taiwan has a unique location, close to the PRC, Japan and the Philippines, and equidistant from Vietnam and Korea (Çolakoğlu and Güler, 2011). Taiwan, which has one of the 20 strongest economies in the world despite its population of 23 million, is officially recognized by only 22 small states around the world, including the Vatican, especially Latin American countries. As can be understood from Taiwan's ethnic structure, it is a country that has witnessed two major migrations in history.
The status of Taiwan is one of the most important issues that could lead to a direct conflict between the People's Republic of China and the United States of America.China, which has been growing economically since the mid-1970s, aims to assert its sovereignty over Taiwan in order to become a truly powerful actor on the world stage. Although most countries in the world recognize Taiwan as a part of China, direct trade relations with Taiwan have made this issue a global problem. In the Pacific region, where military expenditures are the highest, the issue of unification between China and Taiwan stands out as the most proximate cause of a possible war. China's goal of incorporating Taiwan within the framework of its "one state, two systems policy" is primarily blocked by the United States. Powerful actors in the region, such as the US and Japan, see the rising China as a threat and try to balance China, especially through the strategically important Taiwan. In this context, Taiwan is considered as an "aircraft carrier" for many countries.
In the international order established after World War II, Taiwan maintains its military power with the weapons purchased from the United States and remains dependent on foreign support. Given China's increasing defense budget, it is becoming more and more difficult for Taiwan to compete militarily with China. [1]
China-Taiwan Relations and Their Impact on Taiwan's Struggle for Independence
China-Taiwan relations have a very complex structure due to historical, cultural and political dynamics. At the core of these relations, Taiwan's struggle for independence plays an important role and constitutes one of the main causes of tension between the two sides. Historically, Taiwan was taken under control by the Kuomintang (KMT) government following the Chinese Civil War in 1949. Since then, the People's Republic of China (PRC) considers Taiwan as its territory and advocates a "One China" policy. In return, Taiwan maintains its own self-government and democratic system. This situation keeps the dispute between the two sides on the agenda. In recent years, Taiwan has taken a clearer stance on independence. Especially in 2016-2020, the pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won the elections, making the quest for independence in Taiwan more visible. These developments led to harsh reactions from China and further increased tensions between the two sides. China has taken a firm stance against the possibility of Taiwan officially declaring independence. Beijing uses various methods such as military threats, diplomatic pressure and economic sanctions to curb pro-independence tendencies in Taiwan. China uses various methods such as diplomatic pressure and economic sanctions.
[2] Turan, İshak. "ABD-ÇİN İLİŞKİLERİ BAĞLAMINDA TAYVAN SORUNU." Düzce Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 6.1 (2016): 80-105
China's military exercises and shows of force in the region send deterrent messages to Taiwan. This issue is also resonating internationally. The US continues its policy of support for Taiwan and helps Taiwan to increase its defense capacity. This has led to tensions in the relations between China and the US and has had a decisive impact on the security balances in the Asia Pacific region. Taiwan's geopolitical position increases the strategic importance of China-Taiwan relations. If Taiwan comes under China's sovereignty, this could strengthen China's military and commercial influence in the Pacific region. For this reason, the struggle for Taiwan's independence has become more than just an issue between the two sides, but one that affects the regional and global balance of power. In Taiwanese society, there are still differences of opinion between pro-unification and independence supporters. Over time, the public's political leanings and party preferences may shape the approach to this issue. These internal dynamics are among the important factors affecting the political environment in Taiwan. In conclusion, the China-Taiwan independence struggle is not only a tension between the two sides, but also a critical issue affecting regional security balances and the global political environment. These relations are becoming more complex as Taiwan continues to pursue its goal of independence.
Analysis of US-China Rivalry in the Context of the Taiwan Question
Today, the concept of international security has expanded to encompass not only military threats but also economic and political factors. This transformation has deepened the rivalry between the great powers. In this framework, the United States of America (USA), the hegemon in the current international system, has adopted a strategy of limiting the growing influence and power of the People's Republic of China (PRC), a rising power. China's increasing foreign trade volume, its investments in the defense industry and its efforts to increase its influence in the Asia-Pacific region are perceived as a serious threat by the US.
In this context, the Taiwan Issue, which directly concerns China's national security, is at the center of the strategic rivalry between the two countries. For China, Taiwan is seen as an issue of historical, political and geostrategic importance, while for the United States it is an important tool for maintaining its influence in the region and implementing its policy of containment. Therefore, Taiwan has become not only a sovereignty issue but also a symbolic arena for the global power struggle between the great powers.
The aim of this study is to examine the dynamics of the US-China rivalry over the Taiwan Question and analyze the implications of this rivalry for regional and global security. In particular, the study evaluates how the US interventionist policies over Taiwan have sought to limit China's rise and how this strategy has created tension in relations between the two countries.[1]
Taiwan Policies of China and the US
Since the end of the Cold War until the 2000s, the security dilemma between the United States and the People's Republic of China over Taiwan has been further complicated by several political and military events. The first important phase of this dilemma began with the 1992 Compromise. Although both sides seemed to recognize that Taiwan was a part of China, the Beijing administration interpreted this as a reunification of Taiwan as an autonomous region under China within the framework of the "One Country, Two Systems" policy, while Taiwan saw this compromise as a political gesture to maintain peace between the peoples. This fundamental difference of opinion led the two sides to disagree on the status of Taiwan for many years, deepening the security dilemma. The Third Taiwan Strait Crisis in 1995-96 is an important example where this dilemma was taken to the military level. Taiwan leader Lee Teng-hui's visit to the United States on a visa was seen by Beijing as Taiwan's quest for independence, and China responded to this visit with harsh military exercises. The US, on the other hand, tried to balance China's threats by sending warships to the region. This crisis led to serious talk of the possibility of war between the two countries.
[3] Michael Yahuda, The International Politics of the Asia-Pasific, Fourth Edition, 72-86-88-99-114
[4] Çaylı, Şahin, and Beyza Varol. "TAYVAN SORUNU BAĞLAMINDA ABD-ÇİN REKABETİNİN ANALİZİ." Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi 10.33 (2022): 78-102.
The September 11 attacks in the late 1990s and early 2000s, when the global fight against terrorism came to the fore, opened the door to a new era in China-US relations. In this period, China sought international legitimacy to strengthen its "One China" policy by taking a stand against terrorism on the side of the United States. Nevertheless, US President George W. Bush openly expressed his support for Taiwan and stated that Taiwan would be defended if necessary. These statements were perceived as a threat by Beijing and China felt that the US continued to encircle China in the Asia-Pacific. A Chinese national security report published in 2002 made direct reference to this US containment strategy. This shows that the two countries continue to perceive each other as strategic threats over Taiwan.
The September 11 attacks in the late 1990s and early 2000s, when the global fight against terrorism came to the fore, opened the door to a new era in China-US relations. In this period, China sought international legitimacy to strengthen its "One China" policy by taking a stand against terrorism on the side of the United States. Nevertheless, US President George W. Bush openly expressed his support for Taiwan and stated that Taiwan would be defended if necessary. These statements were perceived as a threat by Beijing and China felt that the US continued to encircle China in the Asia-Pacific. A Chinese national security report published in 2002 made direct reference to this US containment strategy. This shows that the two countries continue to perceive each other as strategic threats over Taiwan.
After Hu Jintao came to power, China adopted a softer foreign policy discourse. With concepts such as "peaceful rise" and "harmonious society", China tried to soften its hard line towards Taiwan and maintain regional stability. However, the 2004 attempt to hold a referendum in Taiwan to seek public opinion on Chinese policy was seen by China as a step towards Taiwan's independence. Therefore, Beijing enacted the "Anti-Separatist Law" in 2005, making it clear that it would use force if Taiwan declared independence. This development caused the security dilemma to shift from a diplomatic dimension to a military threat.
In the post-2008 period, the Barack Obama administration, which took over the US presidency, did not make a major change in its Taiwan policy, and argued that the status quo should be maintained by continuing arms sales to Taiwan. The $6.4 billion arms sale to Taiwan in 2010 drew a strong reaction from Beijing, which declared that it posed a threat to regional security. Despite China's objections, the US continued its support for Taiwan, showing that the security dilemma continued during the Obama era.
After Xi Jinping came to power in 2012, China started to take a tougher stance on Taiwan. Xi stated that Taiwan's independence was unacceptable for China and said that China could use military force if necessary. Despite this hardening stance, US support for Taiwan has become more visible under Donald Trump. After Trump's election as president, Taiwan's leader Tsai Ing-wen called him to congratulate him, creating a diplomatic crisis and raising questions about whether the US was committed to the "One China" policy. The Trump administration also strengthened its relationship with Taiwan by selling billions of dollars worth of arms to Taiwan. During this period, Taiwan became both a strategic ally and an important trading partner for the US. The fact that Taiwan is the 14th largest export market for the US and the trade volume between the two sides has reached 90 billion dollars shows that the economic dimension has been added to the security dilemma.
As of 2019, the strategic rivalry between the US and China has moved to a new dimension, with Taiwan at the center of this process. Both countries, led by Trump and Xi, have positioned Taiwan as an area of geopolitical contention as they continue their efforts to increase their influence in the Asia-Pacific region. The US has deepened its economic ties with Taiwan, increasing the volume of trade between the two countries to nearly $90 billion and making Taiwan the 14th largest export market. At the same time, the Washington administration has also increased its military support for Taiwan, approving arms sales worth $1.83 billion in 2018 alone and providing a total of $12 billion worth of military equipment (Bandow, 2020).
Beijing responded to these developments harshly and continued to regard Taiwan as a vital issue for the country's territorial integrity and national security. In preparation for a possible intervention against Taiwan, the People's Republic of China deployed a 400,000-strong ground force to the Fijuen region across the Taiwan Strait, and kept 490 fighter jets in constant readiness. In addition to these measures, Beijing further increased military pressure by deploying around 1,200 short-range ballistic missiles across Taiwan i
n December 2019 (Minnick, 2019).
During this period, Taiwan became not only an internal security issue for China, but also a key ally in the US Asia-Pacific strategy, making the island a symbolic site of global competition between the two great powers.
As a result, US policy towards China since the 1970s, when bilateral relations began to gain momentum, can be seen as a combination of integration and balance policy, as emphasized by Joseph Nye (Nye cited in Lampton, 2005). On the one hand, the US aimed to integrate China into political and economic mechanisms, while on the other hand, it tried to keep China in balance by supporting the status quo in the Taiwan Strait and strengthening regional alliances (Ersoy, 2007:159). It is seen that this policy towards China has similarly continued during the Obama and Trump eras. Although the US arms sales to Taiwan, Trump's meeting with Taiwan's leader and the approval of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, which includes the development of Taiwan's defense capacity, have strained US-PRC relations, the most important factor that emerged in the context of bilateral relations is the balance between "strategic competition" and "strategic partnership "3 . In this context, China's close relations with the countries in the region in the framework of being an effective actor in the Asia Pacific geography serve the policies pursued by the US in this geography. On the other hand, it is seen that the balance between competition and partnership in line with the commercial relations that China should establish with the US in the context of its strategic interests has an impact on bilateral relations. As a matter of fact, although the element of competition is an important part of the globalizing world, the element of cooperation, which is especially effective on
the axis of common interests, plays a role in the context of US-China relations.
South China Sea Problem
The South China Sea (SCS), which is an important route in world trade and is frequently heard of today due to its natural resources, has long been the scene of conflicts between regional and global powers. Research on oil and natural gas reserves in the region has led to increased interest in the SCS. The region is also rich in biodiversity. Ensuring free movement over the SCS has become a priority issue, especially for coastal countries that depend on fishing for their livelihood. The SCS, which is both geopolitically and geostrategically important, is one of the regions where geopolitical rivalry is most palpable today. Especially in today's conditions where the security of maritime supply routes is a very important issue, the voices on the SCS have multiplied and the long-standing SCS problem has become more complex.
In this period of heightened global power competition, the US and China, two important actors in the world, are confronting each other on many issues. An important issue that has recently brought the two great powers face to face has been the power struggle in the seas. In particular, the shift of power to the Asia-Pacific geography has prompted the US to turn towards the region. The interests of China, which is on the rise and growing steadily in Asia, and the US, which does not want to lose its superpower position, overlap in this geography. The South China Sea, with its geopolitical importance, underground resources, biodiversity and its important position in maritime trade, has dragged the US and China
[1] Olkan, Kartal Batuhan. "Çin-ABD ilişkilerinde güvenlik ikilemi: Tayvan sorunu." Journal of Business Innovation and Governance 4.1 (2021): 27-41.
[2] Köksoy, Fulya. "ÇİN HALK CUMHURİYETİ MERKEZLİ TAYVAN, TİBET VE DOĞU TÜRKİSTAN SORUNUNUN AMERİKA-ÇİN İLİŞKİLERİNE YANSIMASI." Ege Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi 10.2 (2019): 83-103.
into a geopolitical rivalry in the Western Pacific. The South China Sea, which has been the scene of struggles between both regional countries and great powers, is becoming an even more unstable region with increasing conflicts. In addition to its individual initiatives, the US has been trying to contain China and restrict Chinese sovereignty in the region through its bilateral and multilateral alliances in the region. In this study, the Sino-US struggle in the South China Sea will be analyzed through the moves the two countries make against each other in the region.
US-China Struggle in the South China Sea
In the post-Cold War era, the most serious challenge to the unipolar global leadership of the United States has emerged from the growing military and economic power of the People's Republic of China. In this context, the South China Sea has become the most critical theater not only for territorial sovereignty claims but also for the ongoing geopolitical rivalry between China and the United States. With its strategic trade routes, energy resources and geopolitical location, this region represents a multi-layered conflict zone where two great powers face off.
US and China's Maritime Strategy and Sovereignty Claims
China bases its claims in the South China Sea on the "Nine-Dashed Line" and justifies these claims with historical documents dating back to the Qing Dynasty. However, these claims do not coincide with the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). China is increasing its de facto control through artificial islands around the Spratly and Paracel Islands and reinforcing its military deterrence in the region by deploying radar systems, airstrips and missile batteries in these areas.
The United States, on the other hand, defends the principle of "freedom of navigation and overflight" in the South China Sea and considers China's unilateral claims as a threat to the international order. In this context, it conducts regular naval patrols within the framework of "Freedom of Navigation Operations" (FONOPs) and develops strategic partnerships with regional actors such as Japan, the Philippines, Australia and Vietnam. This US policy not only serves as a counterweight to China's regional expansionism but also supports Washington's Indo-Pacific strategy.
In 2016, upon the Philippines' application, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague declared China's claims in the South China Sea legally invalid and emphasized that the creation of artificial islands in particular violated the law of the sea. China declared that it did not recognize the decision, which was interpreted as a reflection of China's approach questioning international norms. Despite these decisions taken at the legal level, the de facto situation in the region is evolving in favor of China.
As a result, the South China Sea has become a microcosm of the ongoing rivalry between the great powers in the 21st century. China's efforts to establish its hegemony as a regional maritime power and the US strategy to maintain its global leadership are sharply confronting each other here. Developments in the region directly affect not only China and the US, but also regional actors such as ASEAN countries, Japan, Australia and the global trade system. In this context, the South China Sea is not just a sovereignty dispute, but a strategic node in a broader struggle over the future of the international system.
[1] Sar, İlknur, and Özlem Demirkıran. "Güney Çin Denizi’nde Çin-ABD güç mücadelesi." Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 45 (2023): 413-439.
US-China Relations in the Context of Trade Wars
One of the 21st century's most remarkable global power rivalries is shaped by the trade war between the United States of America (USA) and the People's Republic of China (PRC). Relations, which have developed on the basis of mutual economic dependence for many years, have been deeply transformed by strategic mistrust and structural conflicts of interest, especially since the mid-2010s. In 2018, the US President Donald Trump's administration imposed sweeping tariffs on Chinese goods, a process that pitted the two countries against each other not only in the economic sphere but also in technology, security, and global leadership ambitions. This article aims to analyze the US-China trade war from historical, economic and strategic perspectives.
Background to the Trade War
US criticism of China is mainly centered on three axes: trade deficit, intellectual property rights violations and coercive technology transfer practices. China's export-led growth model, support for state-owned companies and national industrial strategies are perceived as a serious competitive threat to the US, especially in high-tech areas. The 2015 "Made in China 2025" program set out China's goal of becoming a leader in strategic sectors such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence and biotechnology, which set off alarm bells in Washington.
Economic Measures and Reactions
As of 2018, the US administration has imposed tariffs ranging from 10% to 25% on hundreds of billions of dollars worth of products imported from China. In response, China raised tariffs on many items imported from the US, particularly agricultural and automotive products. These measures not only narrowed bilateral trade, but also caused volatility and uncertainty in global markets. In particular, multinational companies were forced to restructure their production chains and turn to alternative markets outside China.
Technological Competition and Geopolitical Dimension
It is clear that the trade war is closely linked not only to economic motives but also to the struggle for technological supremacy. The US embargoes against the Chinese technology company Huawei have highlighted the digital dimension of strategic competition. Washington sees China's technological progress as a threat to national security, while Beijing sees these embargoes as a tool of economic pressure and interference in sovereignty. In this framework, US-China relations have evolved into an environment of structural conflict in which mutual trust has been undermined.
Reflections on the Global Economy
The effects of the trade war were not limited to the two countries. Developing countries have been directly affected by breaks in global supply chains, financial markets have become more uncertain and the rules-based functioning of international trade has weakened. The effectiveness of multilateral structures such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) has been called into question. At the same time, the US-China conflict signals that the global economic order is moving towards a multipolar structure.
In conclusion, the trade war between the US and China should be read not only as an economic dispute but also as a strategic struggle over the restructuring of the international system. While the US is trying to maintain its leadership in the current global order, China is pushing the existing rules with the aim of gaining status both regionally and globally. In this context, the trade war is the economic reflection of the conflicting systemic visions of the two great powers. In the coming period, the shape of this competition will determine not only US-China relations but also the future of global trade norms.
Conclusion
The strategic rivalry between the United States and China is not merely a bilateral contest; it is a defining feature of the contemporary global order with far-reaching implications. Taiwan, the South China Sea, and the trade war are not isolated disputes but are deeply interconnected issues that together illustrate the systemic nature of the competition between these two powers. Each issue underscores the clash between competing visions for global governance: one based on liberal democratic values, multilateralism, and the rules-based order, and the other centered around state sovereignty, strategic autonomy, and regional dominance.
Taiwan continues to be the most immediate flashpoint, with any miscalculation having the potential to spark a direct military confrontation. The South China Sea, meanwhile, remains a contested space where China’s assertiveness challenges the U.S.’s traditional maritime dominance and the principles of international law. The economic and technological dimensions of the rivalry have solidified a broader decoupling process, wherein mutual trust is eroding and strategic suspicion is intensifying.
In conclusion, the trajectory of U.S.-China relations will be a major determinant of global stability in the coming decades. Whether this rivalry leads to confrontation or coexistence will depend on both sides’ willingness to manage their differences through dialogue, confidence-building measures, and respect for international norms. A failure to do so risks plunging the international system into a new era of bipolar rivalry, with consequences for regional security, economic integration, and global governance.
References:
ü Turan, İshak. "ABD-ÇİN İLİŞKİLERİ BAĞLAMINDA TAYVAN SORUNU." Düzce Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 6.1 (2016): 80-105.
ü Michael Yahuda, The International Politics of the Asia-Pasific, Fourth Edition, 72-86-88-99-114.
ü Çaylı, Şahin, and Beyza Varol. "TAYVAN SORUNU BAĞLAMINDA ABD-ÇİN REKABETİNİN ANALİZİ." Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi 10.33 (2022): 78-102.
ü Olkan, Kartal Batuhan. "Çin-ABD ilişkilerinde güvenlik ikilemi: Tayvan sorunu." Journal of Business Innovation and Governance 4.1 (2021): 27-41.
[1] Arzu, A. L., and Hayri KAYA. "Ticaret Savaşları Bağlamında Çin-ABD İlişkileri: Düzenin Sonu." Conference: XI. IBANESS Congress Series. 2019.
ü Köksoy, Fulya. "ÇİN HALK CUMHURİYETİ MERKEZLİ TAYVAN, TİBET VE DOĞU TÜRKİSTAN SORUNUNUN AMERİKA-ÇİN İLİŞKİLERİNE YANSIMASI." Ege Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi 10.2 (2019): 83-103.
ü Sar, İlknur, and Özlem Demirkıran. "Güney Çin Denizi’nde Çin-ABD güç mücadelesi." Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 45 (2023): 413-439.
ü Arzu, A. L., and Hayri KAYA. "Ticaret Savaşları Bağlamında Çin-ABD İlişkileri: Düzenin Sonu." Conference: XI. IBANESS Congress Series. 2019.
TUĞÇE ÖZEN
BÖLGESEL ANALİZ TOPLULUĞU
SİYASET BİLİMİ ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLER
MUĞLA SITKI KOÇMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Yorumlar
Yorum Gönder